Former Kitchener Neurologist Jeffrey Sloka’s Future Uncertain After Acquittal

Even after being cleared by an Ontario judge last week, former Kitchener, Ont., neurologist Jeffrey Sloka can’t work as a physician.

This is because he agreed to never seek or reapply for registration in Ontario or anywhere else when his licence was taken away by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) in 2019.

Last week, Justice Craig Parry declared Sloka not guilty on 48 counts of sexual assault, stating that the Crown didn’t meet its burden of proof and that each patient “provided unreliable evidence” in some way.

The allegations date back to 2010 but came to light in 2017. In April 2019, the CPSO revoked Sloka’s licence after a disciplinary panel concluded he had sexually abused at least four patients.

Sloka did not contest a statement of facts related to the case and accepted having his registration certificate revoked. Additionally, the college noted that Sloka waived his right to appeal at that time.

The college’s investigation and disciplinary actions were separate from his criminal case and were completed before Sloka was arrested in October 2019.

“In this case, a court’s verdict does not change Sloka’s registration status with the college,” a CPSO spokesperson said in an emailed statement to.

“While different proceedings may occur concurrently, criminal charges are laid by police and handled by the courts and are separate from CPSO’s regulatory processes.”

The CPSO is in charge of licensing and regulating physicians and physician assistants while setting professional standards. It also investigates issues concerning its registrants. 

asked the Ministry of the Attorney General if it plans to appeal the judge’s ruling. A spokesperson replied via email that since it’s within the appeal period, it would “be inappropriate to comment.”

WATCH | Defence lawyer David Humphrey speaks outside the Waterloo Region Courthouse:

Former Ontario neurologist acquitted on 48 counts of sexual assault

A judge has found former Kitchener, Ont., neurologist Jeffrey Sloka not guilty on 48 counts of sexual assault following a five-year trial. His medical licence was revoked in 2019 over allegations going back to 2010.

Parry’s verdict

Parry prepared a detailed ruling document spanning over 1,000 pages but only read out its introduction during Friday’s court session. That introduction provided a brief overview of both the case and his findings before an audience filled with supporters for both former patients and Sloka’s family.

“I accept that [Sloka] adequately proposed, identified and explained each examination he acknowledged performing,” Parry stated on Friday.

“Having looked at the totality of the evidence for each count, I’ve concluded that on each count, the Crown has failed to prove that Dr. Sloka used medical examinations as a ruse to gain access to the bodies of his female patients.”

The decision sparked immediate reactions from those present in court; some shouted “shame” while others cried openly.

The charges pertained to patients he treated primarily at Grand River Hospital who sought help for various issues ranging from migraines and seizures to head injuries.WATCH | Reactions pour in after ex-neurologist found not guilty:

‘Surreal to hear’: Reactions pour in after ex-neurologist found ‘not guilty’ of sex assaults. Many attendees left feeling emotional as they processed news regarding Jeffrey Sloka’s acquittal on all charges against him stemming from incidents involving multiple complainants dating back years prior.
Justice Craig Parry emphasized how critical failure lay within prosecution itself throughout entire proceedings leading up until now.

Tension surrounding trial spanned more than three years resulting ultimately culminating closing arguments received late fall towards end November twenty twenty-five where testimony supplied included perspectives offered directly from alleged victims sharing experiences detailing requests made prior visits asking them disrobe under guise conducting required exams such breast/pelvic assessments aside needing justification behind any intent deriving benefits gained beyond medical practices adhered strict guidelines enforced profession(s).

Evidently advocates recognized significance surrounding matter noting importance garnered due high volume complaints lodged hereafter felt shock disappointment echoed loudly reverberated halls nearby courthouse premises whenever verdict revealed public domain amidst continuous discourse ongoing unfolding matters transcribed investigative efforts undertaken review process carried forth thereafter continued diligently pursue truth alongside ethical considerations forefront mind. Outside venue attorney representing accused individual took opportunity speaking press afterwards emphasizing validity underlying evidence accepted concluding statements made courtroom ensuring clarity conveyed regards rationale supporting positions held firmly throughout entirety remaining hopeful attaining just outcomes facing uncertain futures ahead for all involved parties concerned involved further developments anticipated shortly ensuing events transpiring following noteworthy judgments reached thus far concluding remarks delivered previously expressed sentiments resonating deeply across numerous audiences assembled collectively gathering together solemn remembrance instances shared clearly indicative unique challenges confronting today amidst broader legal discussions shaping landscape evolving rapidly.

Source link