The Ontario government has announced it will proceed with a plan to reduce the province’s conservation authorities (CAs) from 36 down to just nine.
The initial proposal, introduced in October, aimed to create seven consolidated CAs. However, due to pressure from existing authorities, municipalities, and concerned citizens, the province revised this plan to increase the number from seven to nine.
Todd Mc Carthy, Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, shared with 570 News Radio that this change is necessary because the government believes CAs have been functioning under a fragmented system that has led to inconsistent results regarding flood prevention and service delivery.
“We want to empower Ontario’s CAs to deliver fast, more efficient and more cost-effective outcomes for the communities they serve. And, at the same time, fulfill their core mandate of flood prevention, watershed management and protecting people and property from natural hazards,” said Mc Carthy. He added, “So we want to make sure they are equally resourced with modern technology and mapping.”
To support this transition, the province has allocated $3 million dollars to the Ontario Provincial Conservation Agency (OPCA), in addition to OPCA’s existing $20 million operating budget.
Kevin Thomason is affiliated with the Grand River Environmental Network. He told 570 News Radio he doesn’t buy into the idea that these changes are meant to enhance CAs.
“We’re in an era of increasing climate change with more flooding risks; heck, look right now. I’m sure the lead item on the news over the last few days has been the flooding in New Hamburg and Ayr and so many other parts of our region and our province,” said Thomason.
He continued by stating his belief that it’s all about development: “And yet here’s the government desperate to build 1.5 million homes anywhere at any cost while trying to eliminate what they label as red tape-removing all guardrails and precautions possible.”
One concern that Mc Carthy mentioned is addressing slow permitting processes. The province’s press release on Tuesday noted plans for modernizing these procedures.
“When you have inconsistent, unpredictable outcomes, it doesn’t work for homeowners when it comes to basic renovations. It doesn’t work for farmers when they seek permits. It doesn’t work for builders of new communities. It doesn’t work for municipalities,” said Mc Carthy.
Thomason believes these adjustments are being made partially as a way to please developers who oppose any regulations.
“The CAs have been strict because they’ve done such a great job managing our watershed-monitoring our floodplains-ensuring people build where they should be and not in ecological areas or floodplains where they shouldn’t be.”
Thomason remarked there have been plenty of challenges faced by CAs in preventing certain developments over time: “Why anyone would want to build on a floodplain is beyond me. On another note though, if there’s money involved don’t underestimate someone’s willingness to try it out-it’s very concerning.”
Impact on GRCA
The province stated that new CAs will take effect early next year.
Once implemented, GRCA will merge into the Eastern Lake Erie Conservation Authority (ELECA), which will also include Otter Creek CA, Kettle Creek CA, and Long Point CA. The ELECA will cover an area stretching from Dundalk in the north down southwards toward Dunnville along Lake Erie shorelines while extending westward into St. Thomas area but avoiding London which will fall under Western Lake Erie CA.
Source link
