Confusion has become a tactic in American politics – and it is undermining our democracy right before our eyes. Confusion isn’t just a side effect of our political landscape; it’s being wielded as a tool. When citizens struggle to discern what is real, lawful, or truthful, the principles of democracy become easier to violate and tougher to uphold. A haze of doubt has settled across the nation, gradually eroding the pillars of our democracy. Millions of Americans-from various political backgrounds-are feeling lost, frustrated, and looking for answers. They witness institutions faltering, norms disintegrating, and long-standing checks and balances fading away. Beneath all this chaos lies a straightforward, pressing question: What’s happening to our democracy?
For years, I thought that leaders in Congress, the Supreme Court, and the White House merely lacked integrity, bravery, and moral guidance to wield their power wisely. However, after observing trends more clearly emerge over time, I now suspect something more profound is at play. Many analysts have pointed to the strategic framework laid out in Project 2025 Project 2025; regardless of whether one agrees with it or not, millions of Americans feel that dismantling democratic norms isn’t accidental-it’s deliberate.
Some people label the President as “ignorant,” a term they use out of frustration. Yet I believe ignorance isn’t truly the issue here. What appears as confusion or impulsivity often seems like a calculated strategy-one honed over decades. Media reports have highlighted patterns involving system manipulation, refusal to pay vendors, challenging judicial decisions, and portraying himself as an eternal victim. These actions didn’t start in the Oval Office; they simply found a larger platform there.
I’ve come to realize that confusion is part of their plan. When leaders contradict themselves, rewrite history, rename institutions or attack their predecessors publicly; it leaves people feeling disoriented. Confusion dulls alertness; it breeds self-doubt among citizens regarding their understanding. And when folks feel overwhelmed by uncertainty, those in power encounter fewer barriers when manipulating institutions or bending norms for their own benefit rather than serving the country.
The risk posed by a leader who rewrites national narratives goes beyond just current events. When a President renames institutions or disregards traditions while mocking predecessors or dismissing constitutional duties-they’re not merely breaking norms-they’re altering what future leaders might think they can do without consequence. Democracies deteriorate gradually through repeated violations that become accepted.
People throughout the nation are trying hard to make sense of what’s going on around them. Meanwhile we’re also witnessing other forms of democratic distortion taking hold-extreme gerrymandering which dilutes voters’ voices (Gerrymandering Explained | Brennan Center for Justice), alongside public attacks on journalism meant to intimidate reporters while undermining core First Amendment rights: ensuring citizens can question authority without fear.
Commentators who continuously use fabricated names – calling it the “Department of War” or “Gulf of America” – need to stop immediately. When media outlets repeat terms lacking any legal grounding they risk normalizing such language further down the line. Reporters must be accountable for using lawful names for our institutions instead of whatever titles a president creates for political gain-just because he states it doesn’t make it valid.
This pattern also includes attempts at reshaping government itself-we’ve seen an ongoing effort aimed at placing individuals who support presidential aims into positions while sidelining others responsible for maintaining transparency and ethics standards within governmental processes. Inspectors general , career civil servants , and independent watchdog groups exist primarily serve public interests-not merely cater any single leader’s agenda. When these roles weaken , or loyalists replace those tasked with oversight functions ; the checks upholding democratic governance start crumbling away.
Additonally we’ve observed how far-reaching influence from this president extends even during his absence from office shaping congressional votes intimidating dissenters ensuring lawmakers align closely with desired objectives Now openly expressing interest seeking another term coupled evidence pointing towards several billionaires backing initiatives could potentially consolidate greater levels control (Open Secrets) A figure capable influencing Congress diminishing oversight commanding extensive financial resources faces little restraint.
The Kennedy Center isn’t just another structure within Washington D. C.; established by Congress back in 1958 under National Cultural Center designation later amended following assassination late president John F. Kennedy naming law enacted transforming into “John F. Kennedy Center Performing Arts” (Public Law 88‑260) This title recognized legally preventing any presidential alteration solely legislative body possesses such authority Therefore whenever someone claims rename Kennedy center alters signage encourages others refer differently they’re attempting rewrite history through spectacle intimidation devoid legal standing.
No matter if his name gets added buildings organizations many Americans won’t recognize altered title The Kennedy Center will always remain The Kennedy Center-a national memorial created by congress deeply rooted historical context tied directly legacies associated former president We refuse accept attempts distort cultural identity We call Gulf Of Mexico rather than “Gulf Of America.” We prefer Department Of Defense instead ‘Defense Of War’ A democracy thrives only when its populace stands firm against surrendering language history truth due political theatrics
One clear instance showcasing this trend occurred during televised interview aired May twenty twenty-five Asked whether obligated uphold constitution document sworn protect twice replied “I don’t know” That response wasn’t merely evasive but alarming How could any leader raise hand inaugural day swear oath before nation then express uncertainty applying said oath? For me personally this wasn’t ignorance It represented performance ignorance-a strategy generating confusion lowering expectations excusing behaviors unacceptable other public servants
Today we find ourselves amid moment where history culture democratic traditions getting reshaped right before us Citizens aren’t wrong feeling unsettled asking questions demanding accountability from those possessing power representing them
We must reclaim normalcy-not complacency but functioning institutions ethical leadership respect constitution Congress needs act-not sit back watching restore damaged elements protect legal names institutions rebuild West Wing assert constitutional authority checking executive powers strengthen ethics laws safeguard inspectors general enforce transparency ensure no current future presidents able rewrite histories rename institutes operate outside set regulations
Media outlets should rise above intimidation attacks They must report accurately based statements made by president yet avoid legitimizing unlawful invented terms utilizing proper legal names correct misinformation promptly refusing normalize confusing misleading phrases directed towards public
Citizens ought insist upon accountability They cannot enact laws however they can pressure representatives compel action demanding restoration damaged structures supporting independent journalism voting speaking up protecting historical truths
These solutions aren’t theoretical-they’re achievable Congress holds necessary authorities pass legislation oversee operations Media organizations possess tools rectify misinformation maintain editorial freedom Citizens wield significant powers vote organize pressuring officials shape popular opinion History showcases democracies successfully repaired after Watergate Mc Carthyism corrupt eras overreach It remains possible today too
This concern transcends party lines Millions across red blue purple states share anxiety concerning witnessed developments Republicans Democrats Independents-including some current retired leaders residing Washington expressed alarm regarding erosion standards alterations institutional frameworks growing awareness underlying shifts occurring democratic foundations beneath us Uncertainty persists nationally unbound ideologically obligation confronting resides collectively among all involved parties
While confusion may serve as strategy clarity constitutes power-and democracy prevails only if citizens refuse allow uncertainties define new norm permitting erosion persist plain sight
Carolyn Goode stands retired educational leader addressing ethical leadership institutional responsibility concerns expressed numerous Americans regarding direction country moving towards
Source link
Source link
